Beyond DIY: The Business Case for External Coaching
When you consider how rapidly your engineering team needs to adapt, you may begin to notice that the right external voice can unlock results your internal resources were never designed to reach.
Why this conversation matters
Over the past three years the demand for professional coaching has outpaced even the explosive growth of the tech sector. The latest ICF Global Coaching Study shows the number of credentialed coaches topping 109,000 worldwide — a 54 % jump since 20191.
Organisations are not making that investment on a hunch. A Metrix Global evaluation reported a 788 % ROI for executive coaching programmes2. Intel went further: their internal analysis links coaching to more than $1 billion in additional operating margin annually3.
Even at the very top, leaders like Jeff Bezos and Eric Schmidt credit coaching as a key accelerant — the Institute for Employment Studies pegs its effectiveness for career advancement at 89 %4.
Yet many scale-ups still default to a “we’ll coach our own people” mindset. Let’s look at that assumption — and gently test whether it serves you or holds you back.
The DIY attraction
Internal coaching feels cost-effective because:
- Lower visible costs — people are already on payroll.
- Cultural shorthand — insiders know the acronyms, politics, and release cadence.
- Immediate access — managers can coach in the flow of work.
Those are genuine plus points. So you can certainly imagine keeping some mentoring in-house while still opening the door to an outside partner.
Hidden downsides of staying internal-only
“We don’t know what we don’t know” becomes painfully clear when the market shifts.
Blind Spot | Impact on High-Growth Teams |
---|---|
Echo-chamber advice | Reinforces the very patterns that created current bottlenecks. |
Conflict of interest | A coach who signs your pay cheque can’t always challenge sacred cows. |
Bandwidth drain | Senior engineers spending 40 minutes a week coaching is 40 minutes not shipping value. |
Skill gaps | Coaching is a profession. Internal mentors may be great engineers yet untrained in deep mindset work. |
A 2023 HR.com survey found only 57 % of organisations see a clear link between internal coaching and performance gains — and most cite “lack of qualified coaches” as the blocker5.
The external advantage
Imagine what happens when your leaders can:
- Step outside the fishbowl — An external coach sees the water you swim in and reveals patterns you’ve normalised.
- Leverage confidential space — People speak candidly when the conversation is contractually separate from appraisal.
- Access cross-industry insight — Techniques proven at Amazon, Spotify, and Intel cross-pollinate into your squads without you footing R&D.
- Scale or pause on demand — External capacity flexes with funding rounds and product cycles.
- Quantify impact — Specialist firms benchmark pre- and post-engagement metrics; recent analyses show returns as high as 14× within 12 months6.
As you consider these points, you might already be wondering how quickly your teams could benefit from the same.
A hybrid model that works
The smartest companies blend both worlds:
- Internal mentors for domain knowledge and day-to-day situational coaching.
- External certified coaches for deep behavioural change and leadership reach.
A peer-reviewed Delphi study comparing internal and external executive coaching highlighted that external coaches drive stronger accountability and longer-lasting behaviour change7.
Studies comparing mixed models report higher engagement and retention scores than either approach alone8.
My perspective
I spent a decade leading mobile and web squads. I loved nurturing talent, yet I saw first-hand how internal demands blur the coaching lens. That realisation drew me to formal training — NLP Practitioner, Certified Scrum Master, and now a Life-Coaching Diploma — culminating in CHughes Coaching.
Because I specialise in first-time engineering managers, sessions cut through typical tech-lead anxieties: sprint pressure, imposter syndrome, and the pivot from maker to multiplier. Clients say the mindfulness tools we layer in save them an hour a day in mental churn — time they feed straight back into product velocity.
When is now the right time?
Only you can decide how much progress you want next quarter. And as you reflect, you can:
- Picture your managers shipping confidently without daily hand-holding.
- Notice what it’s like when feedback conversations flow instead of fracture.
- Realise the cost of one missed launch dwarfs the investment in external guidance.
Next steps
- Benchmark — Run a quick 15-minute diagnostic call with me; you’ll leave with a pulse on team maturity, risk, and upside even if you never engage further.
- Pilot — Test a 90-day sprint with two managers and measure retention, velocity, and engagement deltas.
- Scale — Decide, with data in hand, whether extending the partnership pays for itself — the numbers usually speak louder than any blog post.
Because when you choose external coaching, you’re not adding overhead — you’re accelerating outcomes that were waiting to happen.
References
-
ICF. Global Coaching Study 2024. https://coachingfederation.org/resources/research/global-coaching-study/ ↩
-
Metrix Global. “Executive Coaching ROI.” American University Center for Learning & Development. https://www.american.edu/provost/ogps/executive-education/executive-coaching/roi-of-executive-coaching.cfm ↩
-
ICF. “Coaching Statistics: The ROI of Coaching in 2024.” https://coachingfederation.org/blog/coaching-statistics-the-roi-of-coaching-in-2024/ ↩
-
The Times. “Elite Managers Are Catching a Coach,” 2 May 2024. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/elite-managers-are-catching-a-coach-mqh7hmvq5 ↩
-
HR.com. State of Coaching & Mentoring Report 2023. https://www.hr.com/en/magazines/all_articles/the-state-of-coaching-and-mentoring-2023_lhg43slx.html ↩
-
SparkEffect. Executive Coaching ROI Guide 2025. https://sparkeffect.com/blog/executive-coaching-roi-calculate-your-leadership-investment-returns-2025-guide/ ↩
-
Stober, D. et al. “Internal vs External Executive Coaching: A Delphi Study.” International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316155942_Internal_versus_external_executive_coaching ↩
-
Skillcycle. State of Coaching & Mentoring 2023 – Top 6 Findings. https://library.skillcycle.com/hubfs/Content/Whitepapers/State%20of%20Coaching%20and%20Mentoring%202023/State%20of%20Coaching%20%26%20Mentoring%202023%20Top%206.pdf ↩